<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Predictions: How did we do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/</link>
	<description>For MacGeeks by MacGeeks</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-28567</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-28567</guid>
		<description>Himanshu,

I tried to address this in the post above, but if you remember from Steve Job's MacWorld keynote, he said that the interface for syncing the iPhone with the PC is iTunes.

If you're on a Windows PC today, I believe that you can sync your Outlook contacts and events through iTunes, right (though, in searching on this, I found that this process is not without it's problems--but it's Windows, right :-))?  If that's the case today with the iPod, I believe that will be the case for the iPhone.

But we'll know more soon enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Himanshu,</p>
<p>I tried to address this in the post above, but if you remember from Steve Job&#8217;s MacWorld keynote, he said that the interface for syncing the iPhone with the PC is iTunes.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re on a Windows PC today, I believe that you can sync your Outlook contacts and events through iTunes, right (though, in searching on this, I found that this process is not without it&#8217;s problems&#8211;but it&#8217;s Windows, right :-))?  If that&#8217;s the case today with the iPod, I believe that will be the case for the iPhone.</p>
<p>But we&#8217;ll know more soon enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Himanshu</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-28497</link>
		<dc:creator>Himanshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-28497</guid>
		<description>As excited as I am with the iPhone, I am still worried about one thing - will it or will it not sync with the PIMs on the Windows Platform?

For me (PC at work and Mac at Home) it is very important to sync it all. And currently I use a Dell Axim running WM5 that syncs with both the Macs and PCs with the right tools. So does the Palm OS based devices.

I hope the iPhone will not be a Mac only device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As excited as I am with the iPhone, I am still worried about one thing - will it or will it not sync with the PIMs on the Windows Platform?</p>
<p>For me (PC at work and Mac at Home) it is very important to sync it all. And currently I use a Dell Axim running WM5 that syncs with both the Macs and PCs with the right tools. So does the Palm OS based devices.</p>
<p>I hope the iPhone will not be a Mac only device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-28121</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-28121</guid>
		<description>Everyone says Cingular wouldn't want the iPhone to have VOIP and so would not allow it in the agreement with Apple because Cingular wants you to use your cell minutes. Consumers would love it because it would mean not burning up minutes of their plan while using at home. 

However, if they were to allow it to use VOIP while at home (or wherever there was WiFi), this would attract more people to buy the phone and thus more customers to Cingular - away from their competitors. 

With the Cingular network working with the iPhone, you could do some nice things like the VOIP service is integrated so you still have one phone number - when the iPhone is using VOIP, all your calls to your cell number go over the internet to the phone and the cell radio is turned off to save power to run the WiFi radio. For this to work, of course, Cingular would be the VOIP service provider, gathering much of the VOIP business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone says Cingular wouldn&#8217;t want the iPhone to have VOIP and so would not allow it in the agreement with Apple because Cingular wants you to use your cell minutes. Consumers would love it because it would mean not burning up minutes of their plan while using at home. </p>
<p>However, if they were to allow it to use VOIP while at home (or wherever there was WiFi), this would attract more people to buy the phone and thus more customers to Cingular - away from their competitors. </p>
<p>With the Cingular network working with the iPhone, you could do some nice things like the VOIP service is integrated so you still have one phone number - when the iPhone is using VOIP, all your calls to your cell number go over the internet to the phone and the cell radio is turned off to save power to run the WiFi radio. For this to work, of course, Cingular would be the VOIP service provider, gathering much of the VOIP business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-27425</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-27425</guid>
		<description>I think they started with the basics to highlight the way the phone does stuff--not what it does.

My only disappointment is that it doesn't have iChat w/VOIP.  But they are constrained by Cingular for now.  And iChat doesn't have Voip yet.  BUT, since Leopard is going to have remote desktop with iChat, this would be a killer feature for the phone.  I think we'll see a few more things that the phone will do after or when Leopard is out.  And they are only stuck with Cingular for 2 years.  Think of all the R and D costs that need to be made up by sales of the phone for these first two years.  Essentially Cingular's discount in exchange for a 2 year contract is making in the realm of possibility to buy it.  Once these fixed costs are payed for, we'll see the iPhone drop in price just like the iPod did.

Also, don't be upset that it is not 3G.  I live in an area that has UMTS, and it sucks.  I took my 3G phone back to Cingular and got an Edge based Treo 650 and the call quality is excellent and the internet service is ok.  The problem with 3G in the US is even if you have it, it is spotty, and it will drop calls and data access.

I think apple made the right decision.  Hopefully enough early adopters will by this thing worldwide, so when the price drops to say $350 I'll hop on board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they started with the basics to highlight the way the phone does stuff&#8211;not what it does.</p>
<p>My only disappointment is that it doesn&#8217;t have iChat w/VOIP.  But they are constrained by Cingular for now.  And iChat doesn&#8217;t have Voip yet.  BUT, since Leopard is going to have remote desktop with iChat, this would be a killer feature for the phone.  I think we&#8217;ll see a few more things that the phone will do after or when Leopard is out.  And they are only stuck with Cingular for 2 years.  Think of all the R and D costs that need to be made up by sales of the phone for these first two years.  Essentially Cingular&#8217;s discount in exchange for a 2 year contract is making in the realm of possibility to buy it.  Once these fixed costs are payed for, we&#8217;ll see the iPhone drop in price just like the iPod did.</p>
<p>Also, don&#8217;t be upset that it is not 3G.  I live in an area that has UMTS, and it sucks.  I took my 3G phone back to Cingular and got an Edge based Treo 650 and the call quality is excellent and the internet service is ok.  The problem with 3G in the US is even if you have it, it is spotty, and it will drop calls and data access.</p>
<p>I think apple made the right decision.  Hopefully enough early adopters will by this thing worldwide, so when the price drops to say $350 I&#8217;ll hop on board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-27406</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-27406</guid>
		<description>This is the second time I've heard reference of "Pocket-Darwin."  The first was in episode 41 of MacBreak (http://www.twit.tv/mb41) starting around 4min 11sec, where Andy Ihnatko says it's a stripped down version of Darwin made to run on mobile devices.

Other than that, I haven't been able to find much more discussion of this.  If you can shed any more light on this topic, please post it, I'm eager to find out more about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second time I&#8217;ve heard reference of &#8220;Pocket-Darwin.&#8221;  The first was in episode 41 of MacBreak (http://www.twit.tv/mb41) starting around 4min 11sec, where Andy Ihnatko says it&#8217;s a stripped down version of Darwin made to run on mobile devices.</p>
<p>Other than that, I haven&#8217;t been able to find much more discussion of this.  If you can shed any more light on this topic, please post it, I&#8217;m eager to find out more about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-27396</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-27396</guid>
		<description>I was just curious, because Mac OS X is based on an Unix-like kernel called Darwin, which is open source, will there also be a Pocket-Darwin for the iPhone, and will it be open source as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just curious, because Mac OS X is based on an Unix-like kernel called Darwin, which is open source, will there also be a Pocket-Darwin for the iPhone, and will it be open source as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Deblauwe</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-27349</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Deblauwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 04:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-27349</guid>
		<description>Just out at &lt;i&gt;McSweeney's Internet Tendency&lt;/i&gt;: "&lt;a href="http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2007/1/11cahr.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The iPhone: A User's Guide"! (http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2007/1/11cahr.html&lt;/a&gt;).  One can always dream...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just out at <i>McSweeney&#8217;s Internet Tendency</i>: &#8220;<a href="http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2007/1/11cahr.html" rel="nofollow">The iPhone: A User&#8217;s Guide&#8221;! (http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2007/1/11cahr.html</a>).  One can always dream&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadownight</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-27335</link>
		<dc:creator>shadownight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2007/01/21/iphone-predictions-how-did-we-do/#comment-27335</guid>
		<description>I'm pretty sure that last statement by Steve Jobs means that iPhone apps will be sold the same way as games are sold now for the 5G iPod: through the iTunes Store. The developers can create high-quality apps, they submit it to Apple, and if Apple approves it, they put it on the Store and take a cut. Or perhaps Apple would ask specific developers to write an app for the iPhone, but that would be too bad, because then only fairly large software companies would get the deals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that last statement by Steve Jobs means that iPhone apps will be sold the same way as games are sold now for the 5G iPod: through the iTunes Store. The developers can create high-quality apps, they submit it to Apple, and if Apple approves it, they put it on the Store and take a cut. Or perhaps Apple would ask specific developers to write an app for the iPhone, but that would be too bad, because then only fairly large software companies would get the deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
