<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The MacCast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maccast.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maccast.com</link>
	<description>For Mac Geeks by Mac Geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 08:15:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.04.29 by Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/04/29/maccast-2012-04-29/comment-page-1/#comment-102476</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 08:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3365#comment-102476</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve learned so much about the Mac and other apple gadgets that I decided to do a tutorial podcast of my own and I want a recommendation on Screencasting software I could use.  By the way my podcast website is http://mytutorialpodcast.com.  Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve learned so much about the Mac and other apple gadgets that I decided to do a tutorial podcast of my own and I want a recommendation on Screencasting software I could use.  By the way my podcast website is <a href="http://mytutorialpodcast.com" rel="nofollow">http://mytutorialpodcast.com</a>.  Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.30 &#8211; 1080p Mac Home Theater by Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/30/maccast-2012-03-30-1080p-mac-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-102456</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 01:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3334#comment-102456</guid>
		<description>19/05/2010  22:42                                                                                                                         ??&#039;????! ?? ??????!!! ??? ?? ????? ????? ??? ?? ???? ??? MacBook Pro ??? ?????? (???? ??????????? ?? ??????) ?????? MacMini ??? ?? ?? ?????????? ?? Media Center. ???? ?? ?????...?? ???????? ?? ??????? ??? ?????????? ??? ?! :P ??? ??? ?? ???????? ???? (??? ? ???? ?? ???????, ?? ??????!) ??? ?? ????????? ? ?? wannabe mac-boys ??? ????? :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19/05/2010  22:42                                                                                                                         ??&#8217;????! ?? ??????!!! ??? ?? ????? ????? ??? ?? ???? ??? MacBook Pro ??? ?????? (???? ??????????? ?? ??????) ?????? MacMini ??? ?? ?? ?????????? ?? Media Center. ???? ?? ?????&#8230;?? ???????? ?? ??????? ??? ?????????? ??? ?! :P ??? ??? ?? ???????? ???? (??? ? ???? ?? ???????, ?? ??????!) ??? ?? ????????? ? ?? wannabe mac-boys ??? ????? :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.04.23 by John L.</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/04/23/maccast-2012-04-23/comment-page-1/#comment-102453</link>
		<dc:creator>John L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 18:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3358#comment-102453</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam,

Great show!

I have a couple of questions for you...

After reconfiguring the APN on your iPhone to work with the Straight Talk plan SIM, by chance did you try reconfiguring the iPhone back to use an AT&amp;T SIM?

I ask because I&#039;d like to temporarily try out a Straight Talk SIM in my iPhone 4S just to see how well it works, verify coverage is the same, etc., but I&#039;d need to go back to my AT&amp;T SIM afterwards as I&#039;m still under contract.

You&#039;ve done a great job explaining how to configure the iPhone APN settings to work with the Straight Talk SIM, but I&#039;m a little unclear on exactly which settings I need to change using the Apple Configurator tool to get the iPhone safely back to use an AT&amp;T SIM.  Do I just change the APN back to &quot;wap.cingular&quot;?  Do I need to also worry about setting the Access Point User Name and Access Point Password?

Thanks in advance,

John L.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam,</p>
<p>Great show!</p>
<p>I have a couple of questions for you&#8230;</p>
<p>After reconfiguring the APN on your iPhone to work with the Straight Talk plan SIM, by chance did you try reconfiguring the iPhone back to use an AT&amp;T SIM?</p>
<p>I ask because I&#8217;d like to temporarily try out a Straight Talk SIM in my iPhone 4S just to see how well it works, verify coverage is the same, etc., but I&#8217;d need to go back to my AT&amp;T SIM afterwards as I&#8217;m still under contract.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve done a great job explaining how to configure the iPhone APN settings to work with the Straight Talk SIM, but I&#8217;m a little unclear on exactly which settings I need to change using the Apple Configurator tool to get the iPhone safely back to use an AT&amp;T SIM.  Do I just change the APN back to &#8220;wap.cingular&#8221;?  Do I need to also worry about setting the Access Point User Name and Access Point Password?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance,</p>
<p>John L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 118 &#8211; iPad vs. Notebook by Jafar</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/22/maccast-members-118-ipad-vs-notebook/comment-page-1/#comment-102435</link>
		<dc:creator>Jafar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 01:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3319#comment-102435</guid>
		<description>These guys need there own channel. Not that I&#039;m not an apple fan, I love Apple, but a lot of thnigs on the shows aren&#039;t to do with Apple, so people might be missing this fantastic show by associating it with Apple, and we know how many people have uneducated biased opinions on Apple products *cough*microsoft fanboys*cough*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys need there own channel. Not that I&#8217;m not an apple fan, I love Apple, but a lot of thnigs on the shows aren&#8217;t to do with Apple, so people might be missing this fantastic show by associating it with Apple, and we know how many people have uneducated biased opinions on Apple products *cough*microsoft fanboys*cough*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 119 &#8211; iPhoto for iOS by Fariha</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/29/maccast-members-119-iphoto-for-ios/comment-page-1/#comment-102434</link>
		<dc:creator>Fariha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 22:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3332#comment-102434</guid>
		<description>omg this review is hiaeyiousralh it was bad. its? sad cuz the series was good.I don&#039;t think anyone gay straight male or female liked this movie. I heard even SJP made a discouraging remark about it. You guys are very funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg this review is hiaeyiousralh it was bad. its? sad cuz the series was good.I don&#8217;t think anyone gay straight male or female liked this movie. I heard even SJP made a discouraging remark about it. You guys are very funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.04.29 by Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/04/29/maccast-2012-04-29/comment-page-1/#comment-102422</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3365#comment-102422</guid>
		<description>I there a way in iBooks to &quot;mark&quot; a book as having been already read?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I there a way in iBooks to &#8220;mark&#8221; a book as having been already read?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.04.23 by Bob C.</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/04/23/maccast-2012-04-23/comment-page-1/#comment-102418</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3358#comment-102418</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s &quot;Prine&quot;ville, Oregon, not &quot;Prin&quot;ville. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s &#8220;Prine&#8221;ville, Oregon, not &#8220;Prin&#8221;ville. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 120 &#8211; Security in Layers by How to make a baby boy</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/04/10/maccast-members-120-security-in-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-102416</link>
		<dc:creator>How to make a baby boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 05:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3343#comment-102416</guid>
		<description>Good day very cool website!! Man .. Excellent .. Wonderful .. I&#039;ll bookmark your web site and take the feeds also…I&#039;m glad to search out numerous helpful info here within the publish, we need develop extra strategies on this regard, thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day very cool website!! Man .. Excellent .. Wonderful .. I&#8217;ll bookmark your web site and take the feeds also…I&#8217;m glad to search out numerous helpful info here within the publish, we need develop extra strategies on this regard, thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.30 &#8211; 1080p Mac Home Theater by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/30/maccast-2012-03-30-1080p-mac-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-102409</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3334#comment-102409</guid>
		<description>Well, the original DVDs protect you from literally *losing* the content but what&#039;s also valuable is the time spent creating all the mkv files. I&#039;d hate to have to go all the way back to the discs to recreate the mkv&#039;s.

I needed to face that last week because my oldest disk in the active set suddenly croaked. It  started making that dreaded clicking noise and disappeared from the desktop forever. Nothing could bring that back, except for an expensive trip to one of those hard disk recovery places (see http://www.maccast.com/?s=jc+tale).
Fortunately I had a complete backup &amp; the failed disk was still under warranty (Seagate 5yr). The replacement disk arrived this morning and I&#039;m in the process of copying all the files back.

When the new drive returned, I finally noticed that it was a 7200RPM. I thought I had standardized on their 5900RPM series, which has never failed for me. But I&#039;ve had two 7200RPM external and my iMac external fail (also a 7200RPM Seagate). So, I&#039;m sticking with their &quot;green&quot; or &quot;LP&quot; lines. Reliability over speed is what I&#039;m looking for. (I&#039;ve never had stuttering problems over  HDMI; the bottleneck is in the wireless streaming to the iPad.)

I suppose my rule of thumb is to buy hard disks in pairs. One to put in service for Plex and the other is its backup. Drives are real cheap, but the downside is that you need to buy twice as many of them! If I added another copy for off-site storage, that would triple the cost!

PS Dean, I&#039;ve never had any issues with the current version of Plex (.9x), but my Mac Mini is a generation more recent than yours and I tossed 8GB of RAM in it instead of sticking with 2GB. It was the last generation of Mac Minis that included a DVD drive, so it is considerably slower than what&#039;s sold now. I&#039;d expect the current model can run the current version of Plex without issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the original DVDs protect you from literally *losing* the content but what&#8217;s also valuable is the time spent creating all the mkv files. I&#8217;d hate to have to go all the way back to the discs to recreate the mkv&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I needed to face that last week because my oldest disk in the active set suddenly croaked. It  started making that dreaded clicking noise and disappeared from the desktop forever. Nothing could bring that back, except for an expensive trip to one of those hard disk recovery places (see <a href="http://www.maccast.com/?s=jc+tale" rel="nofollow">http://www.maccast.com/?s=jc+tale</a>).<br />
Fortunately I had a complete backup &amp; the failed disk was still under warranty (Seagate 5yr). The replacement disk arrived this morning and I&#8217;m in the process of copying all the files back.</p>
<p>When the new drive returned, I finally noticed that it was a 7200RPM. I thought I had standardized on their 5900RPM series, which has never failed for me. But I&#8217;ve had two 7200RPM external and my iMac external fail (also a 7200RPM Seagate). So, I&#8217;m sticking with their &#8220;green&#8221; or &#8220;LP&#8221; lines. Reliability over speed is what I&#8217;m looking for. (I&#8217;ve never had stuttering problems over  HDMI; the bottleneck is in the wireless streaming to the iPad.)</p>
<p>I suppose my rule of thumb is to buy hard disks in pairs. One to put in service for Plex and the other is its backup. Drives are real cheap, but the downside is that you need to buy twice as many of them! If I added another copy for off-site storage, that would triple the cost!</p>
<p>PS Dean, I&#8217;ve never had any issues with the current version of Plex (.9x), but my Mac Mini is a generation more recent than yours and I tossed 8GB of RAM in it instead of sticking with 2GB. It was the last generation of Mac Minis that included a DVD drive, so it is considerably slower than what&#8217;s sold now. I&#8217;d expect the current model can run the current version of Plex without issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.30 &#8211; 1080p Mac Home Theater by Dean Dauger</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/30/maccast-2012-03-30-1080p-mac-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-102397</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Dauger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3334#comment-102397</guid>
		<description>Hi Joseph,

As for 1080p video, presumably these are originally from Blu-ray discs that you already own. Therefore the Blu-ray discs themselves become the archive. Similarly for SD-DVD&#039;s you own. I do that with CD&#039;s I own too.  So if you lose the mkv (or transcoded) copies, you can restore them, in principle (with some work yes, but it&#039;s all there eventually). With files this big I think that&#039;s good enough.  

This is different from photos, because you made the photos, and no one else has a copy, so your point is well taken for such photos.  

If you got the video from some other source (Netflix, Bittorrent), well you&#039;re not &quot;supposed to&quot; have that anyways, right?  ;)  (Then just get it again...)

Dean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joseph,</p>
<p>As for 1080p video, presumably these are originally from Blu-ray discs that you already own. Therefore the Blu-ray discs themselves become the archive. Similarly for SD-DVD&#8217;s you own. I do that with CD&#8217;s I own too.  So if you lose the mkv (or transcoded) copies, you can restore them, in principle (with some work yes, but it&#8217;s all there eventually). With files this big I think that&#8217;s good enough.  </p>
<p>This is different from photos, because you made the photos, and no one else has a copy, so your point is well taken for such photos.  </p>
<p>If you got the video from some other source (Netflix, Bittorrent), well you&#8217;re not &#8220;supposed to&#8221; have that anyways, right?  ;)  (Then just get it again&#8230;)</p>
<p>Dean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.04.15 by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/04/15/maccast-2012-04-15/comment-page-1/#comment-102354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3348#comment-102354</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s weird. I started with kind:folder and selected the &quot;sub&quot; option at the top of the window. When no search results appeared I wondered if it was because the image files were in subfolders of the &quot;sub&quot; folder, so I tried &quot;kind:folder&quot; to see what would happen because I knew the &quot;sub&quot; folder was full of folders. At the end of my work day yesterday I shut down my MBP vs the usual just close the lid. This morning, after reboot, I redid the search of &quot;sub&quot; and all my images appeared. I attribute this to the magic of my posting on your website. ;-) Thanks so much for your response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s weird. I started with kind:folder and selected the &#8220;sub&#8221; option at the top of the window. When no search results appeared I wondered if it was because the image files were in subfolders of the &#8220;sub&#8221; folder, so I tried &#8220;kind:folder&#8221; to see what would happen because I knew the &#8220;sub&#8221; folder was full of folders. At the end of my work day yesterday I shut down my MBP vs the usual just close the lid. This morning, after reboot, I redid the search of &#8220;sub&#8221; and all my images appeared. I attribute this to the magic of my posting on your website. ;-) Thanks so much for your response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.04.15 by Adam Christianson</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/04/15/maccast-2012-04-15/comment-page-1/#comment-102348</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Christianson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3348#comment-102348</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Try using the token kind:image instead of kind:folder. Also make sure at the top of the window you have selected &quot;sub&quot; as the search location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Try using the token kind:image instead of kind:folder. Also make sure at the top of the window you have selected &#8220;sub&#8221; as the search location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.04.15 by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/04/15/maccast-2012-04-15/comment-page-1/#comment-102342</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3348#comment-102342</guid>
		<description>I noticed when I tried the tip in this podcast about searching the &quot;sub&quot; folder in &quot;Assets&quot; I find that nothing appears in the search window, even though, prior to the search, I can see that the &quot;sub&quot; folder is full of folders and each folder contains an image. Even when I search for &quot;kind:folder&quot; the search turns up noting in the &quot;sub&quot; folder. Anyone else having this experience? I must be leaving out some obvious step in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed when I tried the tip in this podcast about searching the &#8220;sub&#8221; folder in &#8220;Assets&#8221; I find that nothing appears in the search window, even though, prior to the search, I can see that the &#8220;sub&#8221; folder is full of folders and each folder contains an image. Even when I search for &#8220;kind:folder&#8221; the search turns up noting in the &#8220;sub&#8221; folder. Anyone else having this experience? I must be leaving out some obvious step in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.30 &#8211; 1080p Mac Home Theater by Joseph Hoetzl</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/30/maccast-2012-03-30-1080p-mac-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-102341</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Hoetzl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3334#comment-102341</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Thoroughly enjoy these HT discussions, but one question. While I realize that Drobos are relatively safe, especially with the &quot;2&quot; drive failover configuration, but how are these folks backing up their drobos?  Seems like a lot of effort has gone into building these video libraries, and to me, without an offsite copy of the whole thing is just asking for trouble.  I wrote about this some time ago related to backing up photos, but I guess it could apply here.  I&#039;d certainly welcome a discussion on how people off-site their drobos.

If you are interested, the old post can be found here:
http://www.josephhoetzl.com/backing-up-your-photographs-and-more-why-i-dont-recommend-a-drobo/

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Thoroughly enjoy these HT discussions, but one question. While I realize that Drobos are relatively safe, especially with the &#8220;2&#8243; drive failover configuration, but how are these folks backing up their drobos?  Seems like a lot of effort has gone into building these video libraries, and to me, without an offsite copy of the whole thing is just asking for trouble.  I wrote about this some time ago related to backing up photos, but I guess it could apply here.  I&#8217;d certainly welcome a discussion on how people off-site their drobos.</p>
<p>If you are interested, the old post can be found here:<br />
<a href="http://www.josephhoetzl.com/backing-up-your-photographs-and-more-why-i-dont-recommend-a-drobo/" rel="nofollow">http://www.josephhoetzl.com/backing-up-your-photographs-and-more-why-i-dont-recommend-a-drobo/</a></p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.04.07 by C.A.B.</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/04/07/maccast-2012-04-07/comment-page-1/#comment-102320</link>
		<dc:creator>C.A.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3337#comment-102320</guid>
		<description>I ran the commands to see if my computer infected by the Flashback Trojan and the answer was NO, but Java update from Apple found it (and claims the removed it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran the commands to see if my computer infected by the Flashback Trojan and the answer was NO, but Java update from Apple found it (and claims the removed it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 117 &#8211; 1080p Home Theater by Web Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/14/maccast-members-117-1080p-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-102300</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3304#comment-102300</guid>
		<description>Great, thanks for your share! 
@2012-04-13 16:22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, thanks for your share!<br />
@2012-04-13 16:22</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.25 by Bob C.</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/25/maccast-2012-03-25/comment-page-1/#comment-102256</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 05:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3326#comment-102256</guid>
		<description>According to your iCloud and iTunes Account setup, is it true that you can&#039;t share calendars because you have different iCloud accounts?

My wife and I really need to share some of our calendars, but if there was a way to share some calendars with your suggested setup for a family (multiple iCloud accounts and 1 iTunes account) that would be great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to your iCloud and iTunes Account setup, is it true that you can&#8217;t share calendars because you have different iCloud accounts?</p>
<p>My wife and I really need to share some of our calendars, but if there was a way to share some calendars with your suggested setup for a family (multiple iCloud accounts and 1 iTunes account) that would be great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.30 &#8211; 1080p Mac Home Theater by Ryan Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/30/maccast-2012-03-30-1080p-mac-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-102254</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3334#comment-102254</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my relatively simple setup for my cable-cut system in case it&#039;s of use to some as a more practical setup.. I get content from Netflix (1 disc with streaming), Blu-Ray/DVD, podcasts and some iTunes. I&#039;m not a mad ripper. I own a handful of Blu-Ray discs and most of my DVDs are streamable in similar quality from Netflix anyway. I don&#039;t have this aversion to putting a disc in a player that others seem to - maybe its just that I&#039;m too lazy to rip them and my kids don&#039;t destroy them.

My main TV is a 55 inch HDTV, so 1080p is appreciated there, and so it has the new 1080p Apple TV now. It has a Blu-Ray player and a digital 6.1 surround audio system. It also has a simple antenna to get the sports game when company comes over, but we don&#039;t watch network TV otherwise. I do have the optical audio from the Apple TV connected to the surround sound system so that I can use it for audio AirPlay without having the TV turned on.

The small HDTV in the kids&#039; room is fine at its 720p with an Apple TV 2. The den has the old 32 inch TV with a DVD player for kids videos and the Wii for games and Netflix. Netflix has pretty much any of the kids shows anyway.

For network setup, I have the wireless divided in a dual band with the 5 GHz 802.11n only serving just the Apple TVs and the 2.4 GHz 802.11n/g serving the iOS devices, the Wii and anything else. This is n and g rather than g only so that n devices can go faster and also to make extending it way easier than g only. I have two Airport Expresses extending the 2.4 GHz network and connected to Speakers for AirPlay. My only computer is an iMac, and it is wired into the Time Capsule which is the main router connected to the cable modem. It is important that the iMac has a wired connection to the Time Machine device to keep that chatter off the wireless network and not have to worry about working around it or hacking it. Also, having the Apple TVs on the faster 5GHz band separate from the other things then works well for streaming. I don&#039;t know what other people use for streaming, but the Apple TV does a pretty good job of buffering, so I don&#039;t see dropouts - I may have some slow starts to buffer up.

I had been getting podcasts though the iMac since that&#039;s how I&#039;d always done it, but I just recently changed that. Since I just watch the video podcasts on the Apple TV, I favorited those there. I also only listen to the audio ones on my iPhone, so I switched them to Downcast (tap the artwork to zoom it, Adam).  This setup seems to be working fine, and I don&#039;t have to mess with if iTunes is open on the iMac to serve them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my relatively simple setup for my cable-cut system in case it&#8217;s of use to some as a more practical setup.. I get content from Netflix (1 disc with streaming), Blu-Ray/DVD, podcasts and some iTunes. I&#8217;m not a mad ripper. I own a handful of Blu-Ray discs and most of my DVDs are streamable in similar quality from Netflix anyway. I don&#8217;t have this aversion to putting a disc in a player that others seem to &#8211; maybe its just that I&#8217;m too lazy to rip them and my kids don&#8217;t destroy them.</p>
<p>My main TV is a 55 inch HDTV, so 1080p is appreciated there, and so it has the new 1080p Apple TV now. It has a Blu-Ray player and a digital 6.1 surround audio system. It also has a simple antenna to get the sports game when company comes over, but we don&#8217;t watch network TV otherwise. I do have the optical audio from the Apple TV connected to the surround sound system so that I can use it for audio AirPlay without having the TV turned on.</p>
<p>The small HDTV in the kids&#8217; room is fine at its 720p with an Apple TV 2. The den has the old 32 inch TV with a DVD player for kids videos and the Wii for games and Netflix. Netflix has pretty much any of the kids shows anyway.</p>
<p>For network setup, I have the wireless divided in a dual band with the 5 GHz 802.11n only serving just the Apple TVs and the 2.4 GHz 802.11n/g serving the iOS devices, the Wii and anything else. This is n and g rather than g only so that n devices can go faster and also to make extending it way easier than g only. I have two Airport Expresses extending the 2.4 GHz network and connected to Speakers for AirPlay. My only computer is an iMac, and it is wired into the Time Capsule which is the main router connected to the cable modem. It is important that the iMac has a wired connection to the Time Machine device to keep that chatter off the wireless network and not have to worry about working around it or hacking it. Also, having the Apple TVs on the faster 5GHz band separate from the other things then works well for streaming. I don&#8217;t know what other people use for streaming, but the Apple TV does a pretty good job of buffering, so I don&#8217;t see dropouts &#8211; I may have some slow starts to buffer up.</p>
<p>I had been getting podcasts though the iMac since that&#8217;s how I&#8217;d always done it, but I just recently changed that. Since I just watch the video podcasts on the Apple TV, I favorited those there. I also only listen to the audio ones on my iPhone, so I switched them to Downcast (tap the artwork to zoom it, Adam).  This setup seems to be working fine, and I don&#8217;t have to mess with if iTunes is open on the iMac to serve them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.25 by Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/25/maccast-2012-03-25/comment-page-1/#comment-102237</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3326#comment-102237</guid>
		<description>A few weeks ago I was having a problem with the names of the ripped files from an audiobook. They were mp3 and I had named the files in sequence. When I imported them into iTunes I was shocked to find a list of chapter 1, chapter 2 etc for each disk. So a five disk book had five chapter 1s, five chapter 2s and so on.
I discovered that iTunes did not use the file name but a metadata field called (song) name, Other than editing this field one by one I could not find an application to rename this field.
I contacted the developer of &quot;A Better finder Renumber&quot; but they could not help. This is some of my correspondence to them:
I have  the latest version of renamer and have been using it to rename some audio files. Unfortunately iTunes does not list the file name, only the title. I would like to have the file name and the title to be the same but cannot find a batch method of doing this. Am I missing an option?
The reason I need to edit the song name is because iTunes appears to sort the songs based on that name and not the file name. I have ripped some books on audio DVDs. Each disk has multiple chapters named Chapter 1, Chapter 2 etc. WIth multiple disks the book order gets scrambled. I rename each file with the Book name, Disk number and Chapter number before I use the script to change the song name.
I did find a solution to the iTunes song name problem. I used Better Finder Renamer to create the file name I wanted for the song name. Then I found a script on the Doug&#039;s Applescript web site
http://dougscripts.com/itunes/scripts/ss.php?sp=filenamestosongnames
This copied the filename to the song name and I had what I wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago I was having a problem with the names of the ripped files from an audiobook. They were mp3 and I had named the files in sequence. When I imported them into iTunes I was shocked to find a list of chapter 1, chapter 2 etc for each disk. So a five disk book had five chapter 1s, five chapter 2s and so on.<br />
I discovered that iTunes did not use the file name but a metadata field called (song) name, Other than editing this field one by one I could not find an application to rename this field.<br />
I contacted the developer of &#8220;A Better finder Renumber&#8221; but they could not help. This is some of my correspondence to them:<br />
I have  the latest version of renamer and have been using it to rename some audio files. Unfortunately iTunes does not list the file name, only the title. I would like to have the file name and the title to be the same but cannot find a batch method of doing this. Am I missing an option?<br />
The reason I need to edit the song name is because iTunes appears to sort the songs based on that name and not the file name. I have ripped some books on audio DVDs. Each disk has multiple chapters named Chapter 1, Chapter 2 etc. WIth multiple disks the book order gets scrambled. I rename each file with the Book name, Disk number and Chapter number before I use the script to change the song name.<br />
I did find a solution to the iTunes song name problem. I used Better Finder Renamer to create the file name I wanted for the song name. Then I found a script on the Doug&#8217;s Applescript web site<br />
<a href="http://dougscripts.com/itunes/scripts/ss.php?sp=filenamestosongnames" rel="nofollow">http://dougscripts.com/itunes/scripts/ss.php?sp=filenamestosongnames</a><br />
This copied the filename to the song name and I had what I wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.25 by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/25/maccast-2012-03-25/comment-page-1/#comment-102235</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3326#comment-102235</guid>
		<description>I switched to Downcast right after that &quot;Music&quot; app came out, replacing the iPod app on the iPad. I haven&#039;t bothered to complain about &quot;Music&quot; to Apple, but I suppose I should. I&#039;m sure they know what they are doing. The new name suggested to me that they made the decision to push (paid) music on iPods and (paid) video on Apple TV. In the process, they seem to have thrown the podcast community under the bus. It&#039;s a hint that podcast fans should support 3rd-party developers, especially when Apple steps on their market niche with an inferior product.

I also have iCatcher!, but Downcast is my choice. iCatcher is also a quality product; either is vastly superior to &quot;Music&quot; and deserve our support.

I also tried Instacast HD (iPad only) over the weekend and found that its UI is all messed up. It might grow into a competitor, but right now it seems to be unduly influenced by the &quot;minimal&quot; philosophy of Music. I hear that Instacast for iPhone is different and much better.

Adam, I&#039;m not sure I understand the cover art problem you are having with Downcast. Try &quot;The 10-Minute Test&quot;, VB-H&#039;s auto review podcast. It&#039;s a narrated slide show and it plays correctly in Downcast on iPad. You must mean something different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched to Downcast right after that &#8220;Music&#8221; app came out, replacing the iPod app on the iPad. I haven&#8217;t bothered to complain about &#8220;Music&#8221; to Apple, but I suppose I should. I&#8217;m sure they know what they are doing. The new name suggested to me that they made the decision to push (paid) music on iPods and (paid) video on Apple TV. In the process, they seem to have thrown the podcast community under the bus. It&#8217;s a hint that podcast fans should support 3rd-party developers, especially when Apple steps on their market niche with an inferior product.</p>
<p>I also have iCatcher!, but Downcast is my choice. iCatcher is also a quality product; either is vastly superior to &#8220;Music&#8221; and deserve our support.</p>
<p>I also tried Instacast HD (iPad only) over the weekend and found that its UI is all messed up. It might grow into a competitor, but right now it seems to be unduly influenced by the &#8220;minimal&#8221; philosophy of Music. I hear that Instacast for iPhone is different and much better.</p>
<p>Adam, I&#8217;m not sure I understand the cover art problem you are having with Downcast. Try &#8220;The 10-Minute Test&#8221;, VB-H&#8217;s auto review podcast. It&#8217;s a narrated slide show and it plays correctly in Downcast on iPad. You must mean something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.25 by Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/25/maccast-2012-03-25/comment-page-1/#comment-102232</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3326#comment-102232</guid>
		<description>For podcasts on iOS, I&#039;ve been using iCatcher! for about nine months. It&#039;s a universal app and has most (maybe all) of the features you mentioned in this episode. There are a few, minor bugs; but the app has worked well for me in general.

http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=414419105</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For podcasts on iOS, I&#8217;ve been using iCatcher! for about nine months. It&#8217;s a universal app and has most (maybe all) of the features you mentioned in this episode. There are a few, minor bugs; but the app has worked well for me in general.</p>
<p><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=414419105" rel="nofollow">http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=414419105</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 118 &#8211; iPad vs. Notebook by Raymond Zamora</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/22/maccast-members-118-ipad-vs-notebook/comment-page-1/#comment-102203</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Zamora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3319#comment-102203</guid>
		<description>It is so good and informative! Thanks for your good sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so good and informative! Thanks for your good sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.18 by Ed Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/18/maccast-2012-03-18/comment-page-1/#comment-102200</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3315#comment-102200</guid>
		<description>One thing no one brought up...

...in order to get onboard GPS, you must spring for the 4g/LTE model.

Pilots are one group that need the GPS, and that may be reason enough to step up from the WiFi only model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing no one brought up&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;in order to get onboard GPS, you must spring for the 4g/LTE model.</p>
<p>Pilots are one group that need the GPS, and that may be reason enough to step up from the WiFi only model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.18 by Donald Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/18/maccast-2012-03-18/comment-page-1/#comment-102161</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3315#comment-102161</guid>
		<description>FYI, you can force an iCloud backup even if your iPad (or iPhone, iPod touch, etc.) is not connected to power.  In the Settings app, tap iCloud, then Storage &amp; Backup, then tap the &quot;Back Up Now&quot; button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, you can force an iCloud backup even if your iPad (or iPhone, iPod touch, etc.) is not connected to power.  In the Settings app, tap iCloud, then Storage &amp; Backup, then tap the &#8220;Back Up Now&#8221; button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 116 &#8211; iPad 3 Rumor Roundup by Lovely</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/04/maccast-members-116-ipad-3-rumor-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-102152</link>
		<dc:creator>Lovely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3288#comment-102152</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot of concern at the mmneot by indie Mac developers about the iPad and rightfully so. I&#039;m just starting a new Mac product and the iPad announcement has some difficult implications for me as i move forward. All that said, i think the iPad/Mac relationship will shake out which tasks really need more attention and minute interactions and which tasks can be more casually applied. Your comments about the convergence of iPhone OS and Mac OS are interesting to consider as well. The common origins of the two probably mean each will continue to redefine the other moving forward. Apple&#039;s emphasis on iPhone OS stuff is a little disconcerting for Mac developers at the mmneot, but that will probably change with the announcement of the Next Big OS Thing. What&#039;s more problematic for most of us is what impact an expansion of the App Store model will mean for our ability to deliver software to users and continue to make a living. The new markets for iPhone and iPad apps are overwhelming at the mmneot as everyone tries to cash in, but i think this will also shake out and spaces will open with opportunities for indie developers to deliver great software and get compensated for it. Cuz that&#039;s what it&#039;s about, right? Call me an optimist, i guess.Great podcast, keep it going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of concern at the mmneot by indie Mac developers about the iPad and rightfully so. I&#8217;m just starting a new Mac product and the iPad announcement has some difficult implications for me as i move forward. All that said, i think the iPad/Mac relationship will shake out which tasks really need more attention and minute interactions and which tasks can be more casually applied. Your comments about the convergence of iPhone OS and Mac OS are interesting to consider as well. The common origins of the two probably mean each will continue to redefine the other moving forward. Apple&#8217;s emphasis on iPhone OS stuff is a little disconcerting for Mac developers at the mmneot, but that will probably change with the announcement of the Next Big OS Thing. What&#8217;s more problematic for most of us is what impact an expansion of the App Store model will mean for our ability to deliver software to users and continue to make a living. The new markets for iPhone and iPad apps are overwhelming at the mmneot as everyone tries to cash in, but i think this will also shake out and spaces will open with opportunities for indie developers to deliver great software and get compensated for it. Cuz that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s about, right? Call me an optimist, i guess.Great podcast, keep it going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.12 by Bob C.</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/12/maccast-2012-03-12/comment-page-1/#comment-102124</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3301#comment-102124</guid>
		<description>FYI, only some of the keyboard commands you gave for the VoiceOver works on ZAGG logitech keyboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, only some of the keyboard commands you gave for the VoiceOver works on ZAGG logitech keyboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 117 &#8211; 1080p Home Theater by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/14/maccast-members-117-1080p-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-102120</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3304#comment-102120</guid>
		<description>I suppose that choosing the balance that&#039;s right is each geek&#039;s call; the podcast can, at best, discuss the issues so that we can make an informed decisions. It&#039;s complicated. I wound up choosing a different balance point than either guest, but that&#039;s just me. 

Ara talked about the Handbrake settings a little bit on the previous episode; I agreed with his choices when I was transcoding to mp4/H264. If you use Handbrake, I agree that the discussion should go beyond which preset to use.

Since Ara&#039;s last appearance and tutorial video, I&#039;ve switched to MakeMPV full time, abandoning Handbrake. Since I use a Mac Mini with Plex instead of an Apple TV, I didn&#039;t have that motivation to transcode to an mp4/H264. I experimented with the Handbrake step to reduce file size but eventually decided to skip it because it introduced a different set of compromises!

I settled on maximizing audio/video quality and the convenience of the prep and the user experiences, but at the expense of disk space. 

I&#039;ve got a bunch of disks; this compromise requires them! I&#039;ve had very good luck with Seagates with the 5 yr warranty (1.5 and 2 TB capacities). Each is conditioned in Spinrite prior to deployment and I use those two-slot &quot;toaster&quot; style external enclosures with my Mac Mini. There&#039;s no fans in the system, so noise is not an issue, and the toaster-style enclosures allow for very easy access for a Spinrite maintainence run. I back up the stuff to drives that are connected to an Airport Extreme in another room.

What&#039;s maximized is quality (since there is no transcoding) and speed (since there is no transcoding; did I mention that?). Though the iOS client for Plex plays the mkv files directly, its impossible to actually see 1080p but I do get the convenience of streaming the same file to any device. For ex, if I&#039;m watching a movie on the TV, but its time to go to bed, I can bring the iPad with me and continue watching the movie on the iPad. It remembers where I&#039;m at.

MakeMPV can create one file per track that includes several audio tracks and the subtitles. At playback time, you can choose which audio track you want to hear and whether to display the subtitles. It&#039;s convenient to get all the info from one quick MakeMPV run and then choose your options at playback time. 

As far as all my hard disks are concerned, the Plex server lets you define a bunch of  top-level categories for your collection (e.g., Comedy, Drama, Film-noir, TV shows etc.) and link each category to as many folders as you want. It monitors the watched folders for changes and automatically downloads the metadata when it detects a change. 

For example, this means that the &quot;Comedy&quot; category in the Plex UI can be linked to a bunch of folders that happen to live on several hard disks. That part is hidden from the end-user. He/she just &quot;sees&quot; the category, not the directory structure. When I add a hard disk, I update the definitions of each Plex category to watch the new folders. That change is invisible to the end-user. Also, the iOS Plex clients have a search feature that can search across the entire collection or you can search only within a category. It can play the movie either on itself or on the HDTV.

So, I prefer that set of compromises; to live with the file size disadvantage, I bought a couple of extra 2TB Seagates when I heard about the disaster in Thailand! That ought to hold me over until the prices come down again.

One more thing: There hasn&#039;t been a cable bill for a couple of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose that choosing the balance that&#8217;s right is each geek&#8217;s call; the podcast can, at best, discuss the issues so that we can make an informed decisions. It&#8217;s complicated. I wound up choosing a different balance point than either guest, but that&#8217;s just me. </p>
<p>Ara talked about the Handbrake settings a little bit on the previous episode; I agreed with his choices when I was transcoding to mp4/H264. If you use Handbrake, I agree that the discussion should go beyond which preset to use.</p>
<p>Since Ara&#8217;s last appearance and tutorial video, I&#8217;ve switched to MakeMPV full time, abandoning Handbrake. Since I use a Mac Mini with Plex instead of an Apple TV, I didn&#8217;t have that motivation to transcode to an mp4/H264. I experimented with the Handbrake step to reduce file size but eventually decided to skip it because it introduced a different set of compromises!</p>
<p>I settled on maximizing audio/video quality and the convenience of the prep and the user experiences, but at the expense of disk space. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a bunch of disks; this compromise requires them! I&#8217;ve had very good luck with Seagates with the 5 yr warranty (1.5 and 2 TB capacities). Each is conditioned in Spinrite prior to deployment and I use those two-slot &#8220;toaster&#8221; style external enclosures with my Mac Mini. There&#8217;s no fans in the system, so noise is not an issue, and the toaster-style enclosures allow for very easy access for a Spinrite maintainence run. I back up the stuff to drives that are connected to an Airport Extreme in another room.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s maximized is quality (since there is no transcoding) and speed (since there is no transcoding; did I mention that?). Though the iOS client for Plex plays the mkv files directly, its impossible to actually see 1080p but I do get the convenience of streaming the same file to any device. For ex, if I&#8217;m watching a movie on the TV, but its time to go to bed, I can bring the iPad with me and continue watching the movie on the iPad. It remembers where I&#8217;m at.</p>
<p>MakeMPV can create one file per track that includes several audio tracks and the subtitles. At playback time, you can choose which audio track you want to hear and whether to display the subtitles. It&#8217;s convenient to get all the info from one quick MakeMPV run and then choose your options at playback time. </p>
<p>As far as all my hard disks are concerned, the Plex server lets you define a bunch of  top-level categories for your collection (e.g., Comedy, Drama, Film-noir, TV shows etc.) and link each category to as many folders as you want. It monitors the watched folders for changes and automatically downloads the metadata when it detects a change. </p>
<p>For example, this means that the &#8220;Comedy&#8221; category in the Plex UI can be linked to a bunch of folders that happen to live on several hard disks. That part is hidden from the end-user. He/she just &#8220;sees&#8221; the category, not the directory structure. When I add a hard disk, I update the definitions of each Plex category to watch the new folders. That change is invisible to the end-user. Also, the iOS Plex clients have a search feature that can search across the entire collection or you can search only within a category. It can play the movie either on itself or on the HDTV.</p>
<p>So, I prefer that set of compromises; to live with the file size disadvantage, I bought a couple of extra 2TB Seagates when I heard about the disaster in Thailand! That ought to hold me over until the prices come down again.</p>
<p>One more thing: There hasn&#8217;t been a cable bill for a couple of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 117 &#8211; 1080p Home Theater by Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/14/maccast-members-117-1080p-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-102118</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3304#comment-102118</guid>
		<description>Should have said &quot;... one file that balances HIGH quality and file size...&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have said &#8220;&#8230; one file that balances HIGH quality and file size&#8230;&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 117 &#8211; 1080p Home Theater by Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/14/maccast-members-117-1080p-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-102117</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3304#comment-102117</guid>
		<description>Not a bad discussion, but still no talk about making that one file that balances quality and file size so you only have to create, store, and maintain one file that will work with all modern Apple devices. In my own experience, it isn&#039;t too hard as long as you take some time to understand how to use Handbrake and (more importantly) the settings available from x264.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a bad discussion, but still no talk about making that one file that balances quality and file size so you only have to create, store, and maintain one file that will work with all modern Apple devices. In my own experience, it isn&#8217;t too hard as long as you take some time to understand how to use Handbrake and (more importantly) the settings available from x264.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.03.12 by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/03/12/maccast-2012-03-12/comment-page-1/#comment-102102</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3301#comment-102102</guid>
		<description>The article on the 4G in the title bar of the iPhone is at: 
http://thenextweb.com/apple/2012/03/08/att-apple-hspa-lie/ 

aka, &quot;Apple caved&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article on the 4G in the title bar of the iPhone is at:<br />
<a href="http://thenextweb.com/apple/2012/03/08/att-apple-hspa-lie/" rel="nofollow">http://thenextweb.com/apple/2012/03/08/att-apple-hspa-lie/</a> </p>
<p>aka, &#8220;Apple caved&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.02.26 by Adam Christianson</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/26/maccast-2012-02-26/comment-page-1/#comment-102043</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Christianson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3262#comment-102043</guid>
		<description>Yup, sorry. I fixed it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, sorry. I fixed it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.02.26 by Jason Rudolph</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/26/maccast-2012-02-26/comment-page-1/#comment-102042</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rudolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3262#comment-102042</guid>
		<description>Adam - Thanks for your amazing dedication to this podcast and to the MacCast community!

----

I noticed that the post doesn&#039;t yet include a link to the shownotes. For those (like me) that enjoy reading through the shownotes, you can find them here:

http://www.maccast.com/podcast/shownotes_20120226/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam &#8211; Thanks for your amazing dedication to this podcast and to the MacCast community!</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p>I noticed that the post doesn&#8217;t yet include a link to the shownotes. For those (like me) that enjoy reading through the shownotes, you can find them here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.maccast.com/podcast/shownotes_20120226/" rel="nofollow">http://www.maccast.com/podcast/shownotes_20120226/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.02.20 by Adam Christianson</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/20/maccast-2012-02-20/comment-page-1/#comment-102035</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Christianson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3255#comment-102035</guid>
		<description>Donald,
Thanks for the feedback. Yeah, I should have probably better explained the &quot;salting&quot; thing as I wasn&#039;t using it in the purest sense. Really I was just saying they could add a bit of known &quot;salt&quot; to the data they planned to match against before hashing it. This just adds an extra layer of obfuscation to the data that ends up being passed and stored on the servers. That way even if the data got hacked trying to decrypt the hash would require one more bit of info to be know to the hackers. Not a lot more secure, but just a hair more secure than just hashing the email address alone. And yes, true salting would require the salt to be different each time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald,<br />
Thanks for the feedback. Yeah, I should have probably better explained the &#8220;salting&#8221; thing as I wasn&#8217;t using it in the purest sense. Really I was just saying they could add a bit of known &#8220;salt&#8221; to the data they planned to match against before hashing it. This just adds an extra layer of obfuscation to the data that ends up being passed and stored on the servers. That way even if the data got hacked trying to decrypt the hash would require one more bit of info to be know to the hackers. Not a lot more secure, but just a hair more secure than just hashing the email address alone. And yes, true salting would require the salt to be different each time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.02.11 by DougR</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/11/maccast-2012-02-11/comment-page-1/#comment-102023</link>
		<dc:creator>DougR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3242#comment-102023</guid>
		<description>Good comments in this podcast on how to maintain better video quality when converting, but the real culprit behind the loss of quality when burning a DVD is the maximum resolution of the DVD format.  DVD have a maximum of   720x480 pixels as compared to 720p which has 1280x720 pixels. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD-Video#Frame_size_and_frame_rate,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comments in this podcast on how to maintain better video quality when converting, but the real culprit behind the loss of quality when burning a DVD is the maximum resolution of the DVD format.  DVD have a maximum of   720&#215;480 pixels as compared to 720p which has 1280&#215;720 pixels. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD-Video#Frame_size_and_frame_rate" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD-Video#Frame_size_and_frame_rate</a>,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.02.20 by Donald Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/20/maccast-2012-02-20/comment-page-1/#comment-102020</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3255#comment-102020</guid>
		<description>Silly me, I should have listened to the entire podcast before responding, since you basically said exactly what I just did.  Except you called it &quot;salting&quot; which is technically incorrect.  *raps Adam very gently on knuckles with ruler* ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly me, I should have listened to the entire podcast before responding, since you basically said exactly what I just did.  Except you called it &#8220;salting&#8221; which is technically incorrect.  *raps Adam very gently on knuckles with ruler* ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.02.20 by Donald Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/20/maccast-2012-02-20/comment-page-1/#comment-102019</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3255#comment-102019</guid>
		<description>Minor nit: The &quot;upload your contact list&quot; functionality is a legitimate requirement to provide the &quot;find your friends&quot; functionality -- within reason (see below).  The way that such matching is typically done is by uniquely identifiable data, such as e-mail address or phone number, and compares it with everyone else on the service.  So, if I have you in my contacts list with the e-mail address &quot;adam@maccast.com&quot;, then a service can say &quot;Do I have any users registered with the e-mail address &quot;adam@maccast.com&quot;?&quot;  If yes then it must be the same guy.  Services that do this typically use email addresses and sometimes phone numbers to perform this matching.

However I definitely agree with you that they do NOT need your entire contact list, nor do they need to send it up to their servers (and certainly don&#039;t need to store it for X days).  You don&#039;t need a person&#039;s home address, etc. to perform matching.  Also, rather than send the data in plain text, they can actually compute a hash of it on the iPhone (hashing functions are pretty cheap CPU-wise) and send the *hash* instead of the actual data.  So, instead of uploading &quot;adam@maccast.com&quot; and comparing against that, they hash your e-mail address on your iPhone and instead send up the hash (a1b2c3d4...) and compare those on the server.  That way they never have your actual e-mail data; hashes are a one-way function.  You can&#039;t &quot;crank the sausage machine backwards&quot; and get the original data given only the hash.

So yeah, this is probably a case of Developer Laziness.  *raps developers hard on knuckles with ruler*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minor nit: The &#8220;upload your contact list&#8221; functionality is a legitimate requirement to provide the &#8220;find your friends&#8221; functionality &#8212; within reason (see below).  The way that such matching is typically done is by uniquely identifiable data, such as e-mail address or phone number, and compares it with everyone else on the service.  So, if I have you in my contacts list with the e-mail address &#8220;adam@maccast.com&#8221;, then a service can say &#8220;Do I have any users registered with the e-mail address &#8220;adam@maccast.com&#8221;?&#8221;  If yes then it must be the same guy.  Services that do this typically use email addresses and sometimes phone numbers to perform this matching.</p>
<p>However I definitely agree with you that they do NOT need your entire contact list, nor do they need to send it up to their servers (and certainly don&#8217;t need to store it for X days).  You don&#8217;t need a person&#8217;s home address, etc. to perform matching.  Also, rather than send the data in plain text, they can actually compute a hash of it on the iPhone (hashing functions are pretty cheap CPU-wise) and send the *hash* instead of the actual data.  So, instead of uploading &#8220;adam@maccast.com&#8221; and comparing against that, they hash your e-mail address on your iPhone and instead send up the hash (a1b2c3d4&#8230;) and compare those on the server.  That way they never have your actual e-mail data; hashes are a one-way function.  You can&#8217;t &#8220;crank the sausage machine backwards&#8221; and get the original data given only the hash.</p>
<p>So yeah, this is probably a case of Developer Laziness.  *raps developers hard on knuckles with ruler*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.02.11 by ChrisG</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/11/maccast-2012-02-11/comment-page-1/#comment-102018</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3242#comment-102018</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up on iTunes PlayCache. Mine isn&#039;t huge (~500mb), but I have been playing more and more &quot;streamed&quot; music from my library. After checking out the folder I just made a Hazel rule to watch the folder size. If PlayCache ever exceeds 1gb Hazel will pop up a persistent growl notification and move the PlayCache folder to the Trash. I already have Trash rules in place so when that grows too large the Trash will be flushed as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up on iTunes PlayCache. Mine isn&#8217;t huge (~500mb), but I have been playing more and more &#8220;streamed&#8221; music from my library. After checking out the folder I just made a Hazel rule to watch the folder size. If PlayCache ever exceeds 1gb Hazel will pop up a persistent growl notification and move the PlayCache folder to the Trash. I already have Trash rules in place so when that grows too large the Trash will be flushed as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.02.11 by Tim Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/11/maccast-2012-02-11/comment-page-1/#comment-101997</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3242#comment-101997</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam, 

I have a 2009 white MacBook that I upgraded with OWC&#039;s data doubler bracket and a 64GB Kingston SSD. I also upgraded to Lion at the same time. On three occasions in the last 4 months, I have started up to find an endless spinning pinwheel at the apple screen. On each occasion I was unable to repair the SSD (which is my system disk). I keep all my data on the regular 500GB HD (and backups), so I haven&#039;t lost anything. However, 3 times is now a pattern, and it takes several hours to reinstall Lion and all my apps. Many of my apps were bought before the App Store as well, which takes even more time. Could this be a result of the iTunes cache you mentioned, bloating my drive and squeezing the free space to a too small percentage? I have read that OS X needs more than 10% free space to run efficiently...

Also, just to correct something you have said a few times, Louis CK and Lewis Black are two different (vastly different!) comedians, not the same person.   ; )

Thanks,

TSW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam, </p>
<p>I have a 2009 white MacBook that I upgraded with OWC&#8217;s data doubler bracket and a 64GB Kingston SSD. I also upgraded to Lion at the same time. On three occasions in the last 4 months, I have started up to find an endless spinning pinwheel at the apple screen. On each occasion I was unable to repair the SSD (which is my system disk). I keep all my data on the regular 500GB HD (and backups), so I haven&#8217;t lost anything. However, 3 times is now a pattern, and it takes several hours to reinstall Lion and all my apps. Many of my apps were bought before the App Store as well, which takes even more time. Could this be a result of the iTunes cache you mentioned, bloating my drive and squeezing the free space to a too small percentage? I have read that OS X needs more than 10% free space to run efficiently&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, just to correct something you have said a few times, Louis CK and Lewis Black are two different (vastly different!) comedians, not the same person.   ; )</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>TSW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 113 &#8211; Not Stupid Safari Tricks by MarcPolo</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/09/maccast-members-112-not-stupid-safari-tricks/comment-page-1/#comment-101995</link>
		<dc:creator>MarcPolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3236#comment-101995</guid>
		<description>Cannot download this podcast, either through the latest iTunes or from this website.
Is the file mislocated, perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannot download this podcast, either through the latest iTunes or from this website.<br />
Is the file mislocated, perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.02.11 by TimA</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/11/maccast-2012-02-11/comment-page-1/#comment-101993</link>
		<dc:creator>TimA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3242#comment-101993</guid>
		<description>Saving a picture out of contacts is easy. Hold your finger on the picture till you get the option to copy then paste it into an email. When you send the email to yourself you are prompted on the file size/resolution to send. Selecting the max, then move it to iPhoto when the email arrives on your desktop. 

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saving a picture out of contacts is easy. Hold your finger on the picture till you get the option to copy then paste it into an email. When you send the email to yourself you are prompted on the file size/resolution to send. Selecting the max, then move it to iPhoto when the email arrives on your desktop. </p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 111 &#8211; Thoughts on Education Event by Learn Spanish in Spain</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/01/22/maccast-members-111-thoughts-on-education-event/comment-page-1/#comment-101987</link>
		<dc:creator>Learn Spanish in Spain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3207#comment-101987</guid>
		<description>If you have ever taken language courses before and failed to see your instruction through to the end, you may already know how difficult it can be to retain a language in your memory without constant practice. There are now a number of new methods that can be used to help combat this retention problem, so that you are better able to hold onto what you have learned, and use it even when you are not immersed in the culture that speaks that language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have ever taken language courses before and failed to see your instruction through to the end, you may already know how difficult it can be to retain a language in your memory without constant practice. There are now a number of new methods that can be used to help combat this retention problem, so that you are better able to hold onto what you have learned, and use it even when you are not immersed in the culture that speaks that language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.02.01 &#8211; Macworld&#124;iWorld 2012, part 2 by Corrie</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/02/01/maccast-2012-02-01-macworldiworld-2012-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-101973</link>
		<dc:creator>Corrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3231#comment-101973</guid>
		<description>Hello Adam,
	I think your show is terrific. I have learned so much about computing by listening to your over the years and visiting your forums intermittently. Thank you for the work that you do. 
	Both you and Rob at TII have been promoting Hover as a domain host recently. I moved some of my domain names to their enterprise and was extremely satisfied with the process. After the first experience I tried to move several other domain names but was thwarted by my host, Go Daddy. As it turns out I had recently changed one of the settings having to do with privacy and Go Daddy stated that there is a waiting period of 60 days before one can make a transfer after any settings are change on a domain. I was quite surprised about this restriction. This is all to say that you may want to warn the audience about the issue before they try to transfer to Hover. I would not want anyone to have the same experience as I did with Go Daddy.

Here is the email Go Daddy sent to me:
******************************************
REGISTRAR TRANSFER DENIED
******************************************

Dear Corrie Anderson,

The transfer of AIMS4U.MOBI from GoDaddy.com, Inc. to another registrar could not be completed for the following reason(s):    

Express written objection to the transfer from the Transfer Contact. (e.g. - email, fax, paper document or other processes by which the Transfer Contact has expressly and voluntarily objected through opt-in means).  

The express written objection may be the result of a pending or recently completed Change of Registered Name Holder. This is an opt-in process during which the new Registered Name Holder agrees not to transfer for 60-days. This domain will be transferrable on 2/8/2012.

If you believe that this domain name does not fit the situation described above, go tohttp://support.godaddy.com/?prog_id=GoDaddy&amp;isc=gdbba35 for assistance.    

Regards,  
Go Daddy Domain Services

******************************************

Since you are recommending transferring Domain names to Hover, what are you telling folks to do about hosting their iWeb sites? Apple is eliminating MobileMe and iDisk this year so I suspect iWeb will be lost. I am afraid that my web site will be lost in oblivion. I haven&#039;t heard that Apple is planning an alternative hosting process. Are we to move the web sites to iCloud? Your thoughts and comments would be welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Adam,<br />
	I think your show is terrific. I have learned so much about computing by listening to your over the years and visiting your forums intermittently. Thank you for the work that you do.<br />
	Both you and Rob at TII have been promoting Hover as a domain host recently. I moved some of my domain names to their enterprise and was extremely satisfied with the process. After the first experience I tried to move several other domain names but was thwarted by my host, Go Daddy. As it turns out I had recently changed one of the settings having to do with privacy and Go Daddy stated that there is a waiting period of 60 days before one can make a transfer after any settings are change on a domain. I was quite surprised about this restriction. This is all to say that you may want to warn the audience about the issue before they try to transfer to Hover. I would not want anyone to have the same experience as I did with Go Daddy.</p>
<p>Here is the email Go Daddy sent to me:<br />
******************************************<br />
REGISTRAR TRANSFER DENIED<br />
******************************************</p>
<p>Dear Corrie Anderson,</p>
<p>The transfer of AIMS4U.MOBI from GoDaddy.com, Inc. to another registrar could not be completed for the following reason(s):    </p>
<p>Express written objection to the transfer from the Transfer Contact. (e.g. &#8211; email, fax, paper document or other processes by which the Transfer Contact has expressly and voluntarily objected through opt-in means).  </p>
<p>The express written objection may be the result of a pending or recently completed Change of Registered Name Holder. This is an opt-in process during which the new Registered Name Holder agrees not to transfer for 60-days. This domain will be transferrable on 2/8/2012.</p>
<p>If you believe that this domain name does not fit the situation described above, go tohttp://support.godaddy.com/?prog_id=GoDaddy&amp;isc=gdbba35 for assistance.    </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Go Daddy Domain Services</p>
<p>******************************************</p>
<p>Since you are recommending transferring Domain names to Hover, what are you telling folks to do about hosting their iWeb sites? Apple is eliminating MobileMe and iDisk this year so I suspect iWeb will be lost. I am afraid that my web site will be lost in oblivion. I haven&#8217;t heard that Apple is planning an alternative hosting process. Are we to move the web sites to iCloud? Your thoughts and comments would be welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.01.25 by Corrado</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/01/26/maccast-2012-01-25/comment-page-1/#comment-101960</link>
		<dc:creator>Corrado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3213#comment-101960</guid>
		<description>Scully seems to have much to say now that Steve Jobs is dead.
Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scully seems to have much to say now that Steve Jobs is dead.<br />
Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.01.16 by Marek Polak</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/01/16/maccast-2012-01-16/comment-page-1/#comment-101954</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek Polak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3202#comment-101954</guid>
		<description>Mail sends images as an inline content as  default and shrinks the file size (resolution). If one of the attachments is non-image (i.e. TXT) then all attached images will be treated as an attachments, rather than embedded into the body.
Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mail sends images as an inline content as  default and shrinks the file size (resolution). If one of the attachments is non-image (i.e. TXT) then all attached images will be treated as an attachments, rather than embedded into the body.<br />
Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2012.01.16 by Bob C.</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/01/16/maccast-2012-01-16/comment-page-1/#comment-101950</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/?p=3202#comment-101950</guid>
		<description>Can you please give us the link to a patch that addresses this issue you mentioned? I don&#039;t see it in the show notes :

&quot;...PDF attachments sent from Apple Mail to a Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 with Update Rollup 3 for Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 3 (SP3) to an Microsoft Outlook 2010 client.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please give us the link to a patch that addresses this issue you mentioned? I don&#8217;t see it in the show notes :</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;PDF attachments sent from Apple Mail to a Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 with Update Rollup 3 for Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 3 (SP3) to an Microsoft Outlook 2010 client.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2011.12.23 &#8211; Blu-ray and Mac Home Theater by brian grishaber</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2011/12/23/maccast-2011-12-23-blu-ray-and-mac-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-101933</link>
		<dc:creator>brian grishaber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2011/12/23/maccast-2011-12-23-blu-ray-and-mac-home-theater/#comment-101933</guid>
		<description>I assume that the burning time is faster if i install a BR Player in my MacPro.
The USB must slow it down a bit. 
Any suggestions for an internal player?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that the burning time is faster if i install a BR Player in my MacPro.<br />
The USB must slow it down a bit.<br />
Any suggestions for an internal player?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2011.12.30 by Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2011/12/30/maccast-2011-12-30/comment-page-1/#comment-101932</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2011/12/30/maccast-2011-12-30/#comment-101932</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to throw my two cents that there is no way Apple would allow existing iPad apps to run at native resolution on a Retina display iPad. There won&#039;t be a choice: they will run pixel-doubled, and simply look fuzzy until developers update them. These apps were designed for 9.7&quot;-display, and displaying them at at a quarter of their intended size is definitely a worse experience than a bit of fuzziness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to throw my two cents that there is no way Apple would allow existing iPad apps to run at native resolution on a Retina display iPad. There won&#8217;t be a choice: they will run pixel-doubled, and simply look fuzzy until developers update them. These apps were designed for 9.7&#8243;-display, and displaying them at at a quarter of their intended size is definitely a worse experience than a bit of fuzziness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2011.12.23 &#8211; Blu-ray and Mac Home Theater by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2011/12/23/maccast-2011-12-23-blu-ray-and-mac-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-101923</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2011/12/23/maccast-2011-12-23-blu-ray-and-mac-home-theater/#comment-101923</guid>
		<description>Well, the DVD writer in my iMac died over the holidays, so I need to order an external Blu-ray player sooner rather than later! In the meantime, I downloaded the MakeMKV software and tried it out using my Mac mini (the HTPC) that still has an operational DVD player. It looks good! Real good. 

I did several DVDs, both commerical and some DVD+R&#039;s that I used to back up TiVoed movies. My HTPC is built around Plex instead of Apple TV; as I suspected, Plex can &quot;see&quot; MKV files directly. I just put the MKV file in one of the folders that Plex already &quot;knows&quot; about and it automatically catalogs it, downloads the metadata, and the cover art. 

I&#039;m developing a little bit different process than what Ara described. I like DVD commentary tracks and supplemental features, so I&#039;m just grabbing most everything in the one MakeMKV run. In contrast to Ara&#039;s process, I&#039;m checking what MakeMKV selected to make sure that it selected *all* the commentary tracks &amp; special features. A MakeMKV run is much faster than Handbrake -- probably because it is not compressing anything -- so it is no big deal to just grab everything you want.

If the DVD contains several different video files, MakeMKV automatically creates separate files. You can rename them so you can tell them apart and group all the files for a DVD into a folder. In Plex, you can display the catalog by folder; you group the files by DVD in this way.

A nice feature of Plex is that you can choose the audio track at playback time. If you keep more than one audio track, you will get a pop-up menu with the available audio tracks. In this way, the one MKV file works as a &quot;universal&quot; movie file.

You can also have MakeMKV keep the subtitles.  I prefer the original language audio but the English subtitles. Using VLC, I verified that the requested subtitles are stored in the MKV file.  Plex also has an option to choose a subtitle track at playback time, but it doesn&#039;t work right. I can select the desired audio track and the desired subtitle track, but Plex munges up the subtitles. That part has to wait for a bug fix or try to figure this out.  It looks like a textencoding problem

The other issue with the MKV files is that they are so large that some don&#039;t stream to the iOS devices without stuttering. They play on the HDTV great, but that is a wired connection.  To get wireless going flawlessly for every movie, I&#039;d need to proceed to Step 3 and transcode the MKV to mp4/H264 using Handbrake. Unfortunately, the whole theee-step process is real time consuming. The resulting .mp4 is about half the size of the MKV but it streams perfectly to iPad and iPhone. On the other hand, sometimes the MKV streams to my iPhone or iPad perfectly, so I need to figure this out better. Perhaps I only need to get a wireless extender nearer the iOS device (I&#039;ve got an Airport Extreme in a different room).

I suppose that using Plex is the solution to Ara&#039;s problem of preserving the Blu-ray video and audio quality for digital media. It gives you everying and at full quality. With Plex, you can truly put the disks into deep storage. 

But it all works! I can see that it is far from being ready for the mass-market, but it has an extremely high coolness factor for mac geeks, despite what PC pundits think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the DVD writer in my iMac died over the holidays, so I need to order an external Blu-ray player sooner rather than later! In the meantime, I downloaded the MakeMKV software and tried it out using my Mac mini (the HTPC) that still has an operational DVD player. It looks good! Real good. </p>
<p>I did several DVDs, both commerical and some DVD+R&#8217;s that I used to back up TiVoed movies. My HTPC is built around Plex instead of Apple TV; as I suspected, Plex can &#8220;see&#8221; MKV files directly. I just put the MKV file in one of the folders that Plex already &#8220;knows&#8221; about and it automatically catalogs it, downloads the metadata, and the cover art. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m developing a little bit different process than what Ara described. I like DVD commentary tracks and supplemental features, so I&#8217;m just grabbing most everything in the one MakeMKV run. In contrast to Ara&#8217;s process, I&#8217;m checking what MakeMKV selected to make sure that it selected *all* the commentary tracks &amp; special features. A MakeMKV run is much faster than Handbrake &#8212; probably because it is not compressing anything &#8212; so it is no big deal to just grab everything you want.</p>
<p>If the DVD contains several different video files, MakeMKV automatically creates separate files. You can rename them so you can tell them apart and group all the files for a DVD into a folder. In Plex, you can display the catalog by folder; you group the files by DVD in this way.</p>
<p>A nice feature of Plex is that you can choose the audio track at playback time. If you keep more than one audio track, you will get a pop-up menu with the available audio tracks. In this way, the one MKV file works as a &#8220;universal&#8221; movie file.</p>
<p>You can also have MakeMKV keep the subtitles.  I prefer the original language audio but the English subtitles. Using VLC, I verified that the requested subtitles are stored in the MKV file.  Plex also has an option to choose a subtitle track at playback time, but it doesn&#8217;t work right. I can select the desired audio track and the desired subtitle track, but Plex munges up the subtitles. That part has to wait for a bug fix or try to figure this out.  It looks like a textencoding problem</p>
<p>The other issue with the MKV files is that they are so large that some don&#8217;t stream to the iOS devices without stuttering. They play on the HDTV great, but that is a wired connection.  To get wireless going flawlessly for every movie, I&#8217;d need to proceed to Step 3 and transcode the MKV to mp4/H264 using Handbrake. Unfortunately, the whole theee-step process is real time consuming. The resulting .mp4 is about half the size of the MKV but it streams perfectly to iPad and iPhone. On the other hand, sometimes the MKV streams to my iPhone or iPad perfectly, so I need to figure this out better. Perhaps I only need to get a wireless extender nearer the iOS device (I&#8217;ve got an Airport Extreme in a different room).</p>
<p>I suppose that using Plex is the solution to Ara&#8217;s problem of preserving the Blu-ray video and audio quality for digital media. It gives you everying and at full quality. With Plex, you can truly put the disks into deep storage. </p>
<p>But it all works! I can see that it is far from being ready for the mass-market, but it has an extremely high coolness factor for mac geeks, despite what PC pundits think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast Members 109 &#8211; Apple Cooling Off in 2012 by john foster</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2012/01/03/maccast-members-108-apple-cooling-off-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-101916</link>
		<dc:creator>john foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 06:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2012/01/03/maccast-members-108-apple-cooling-off-in-2012/#comment-101916</guid>
		<description>cool? when was Apple ever cool?

according the old guard press Apple has been dead, dying or about to die since it first opened the doors. they have never been kind. the computers were tolerated in a business because some part of them were needed to get a job done that couldn&#039;t get done any other way. it seems odd that nearly every magazine used Macs in some kind of way until Windows 95 made it more tolerable to do layout, color correction and other prepress work. kinda cool as long as it made the presses run. sure.

remember when the floppy got axed. Henry Norr (one of the best Mac news guys ever) dedicated 4 column inches of his review of the iMac for MacWeek about what a terrible mistake this was going to be. totally uncool was the word.

when the iPod came out 10 years ago it was declared a instant dud because it was expensive and only worked on a Mac. totally uncool said everyone on SlashDot.

Macintosh never worked well with an Exchange server. and Office for Mac or Windows have had interoperability issues since forever. but that&#039;s not Apple&#039;s fault. but it does make working with them uncool according to IT nerds that have to deal with the screams of the lusers.

and look at all the cool technology that has been killed along the way. why before it even got out of the box Mac BASIC had been knifed to make people happy. but let&#039;s make a list just to be sure: HyperCard, Dylan, AppleTalk (the protocol), printers, small displays, and I could go on and on. what is next? FireWire and optical media. venders and retailers are left with unsellable inventory again and again and it&#039;s really uncool that there is that wake of trash.

Final Cut Pro X is either the best thing ever or you wondered why you didn&#039;t jump to Adobe or Avid long ago. it&#039;s a 1.o product and you&#039;d be crazy not to look at other technology. my feeling is that this move of alienation of a user base was intentional. they are a demanding lot. but the way it was done was totally uncool.

Apple has been a uncool to it&#039;s partners. we won&#039;t ever really know how much money IBM/Motorola lost over Apple switching to Intel. billions were invested in getting fabrication and assembly to make zillions of CPUs. after Apple left there wasn&#039;t a customer. at least 4 companies got left holding the bag making developer tools. not to mention forcing every single Mac developer to rewrite thousands of lines of code to make it work on Intel based Macs. sure, some of it was simple. but look at how long it took Adobe to finish it&#039;s migration. 

the number of features that Apple has appropriated from 3rd party developers is countless. one day you might be making a working wage selling a tool only to find it as a feature in the next OS. small developer beware. don&#039;t count on long term revenue stream. especially if what you made is cool.

if Apple was ever cool it&#039;s news to me. this is a company that you should be very wary in your dealings if you are trying to make a living around them.

but from a user perspective. sure. it&#039;s cool. Apple is cool. just be sure you have AppleCare on Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool? when was Apple ever cool?</p>
<p>according the old guard press Apple has been dead, dying or about to die since it first opened the doors. they have never been kind. the computers were tolerated in a business because some part of them were needed to get a job done that couldn&#8217;t get done any other way. it seems odd that nearly every magazine used Macs in some kind of way until Windows 95 made it more tolerable to do layout, color correction and other prepress work. kinda cool as long as it made the presses run. sure.</p>
<p>remember when the floppy got axed. Henry Norr (one of the best Mac news guys ever) dedicated 4 column inches of his review of the iMac for MacWeek about what a terrible mistake this was going to be. totally uncool was the word.</p>
<p>when the iPod came out 10 years ago it was declared a instant dud because it was expensive and only worked on a Mac. totally uncool said everyone on SlashDot.</p>
<p>Macintosh never worked well with an Exchange server. and Office for Mac or Windows have had interoperability issues since forever. but that&#8217;s not Apple&#8217;s fault. but it does make working with them uncool according to IT nerds that have to deal with the screams of the lusers.</p>
<p>and look at all the cool technology that has been killed along the way. why before it even got out of the box Mac BASIC had been knifed to make people happy. but let&#8217;s make a list just to be sure: HyperCard, Dylan, AppleTalk (the protocol), printers, small displays, and I could go on and on. what is next? FireWire and optical media. venders and retailers are left with unsellable inventory again and again and it&#8217;s really uncool that there is that wake of trash.</p>
<p>Final Cut Pro X is either the best thing ever or you wondered why you didn&#8217;t jump to Adobe or Avid long ago. it&#8217;s a 1.o product and you&#8217;d be crazy not to look at other technology. my feeling is that this move of alienation of a user base was intentional. they are a demanding lot. but the way it was done was totally uncool.</p>
<p>Apple has been a uncool to it&#8217;s partners. we won&#8217;t ever really know how much money IBM/Motorola lost over Apple switching to Intel. billions were invested in getting fabrication and assembly to make zillions of CPUs. after Apple left there wasn&#8217;t a customer. at least 4 companies got left holding the bag making developer tools. not to mention forcing every single Mac developer to rewrite thousands of lines of code to make it work on Intel based Macs. sure, some of it was simple. but look at how long it took Adobe to finish it&#8217;s migration. </p>
<p>the number of features that Apple has appropriated from 3rd party developers is countless. one day you might be making a working wage selling a tool only to find it as a feature in the next OS. small developer beware. don&#8217;t count on long term revenue stream. especially if what you made is cool.</p>
<p>if Apple was ever cool it&#8217;s news to me. this is a company that you should be very wary in your dealings if you are trying to make a living around them.</p>
<p>but from a user perspective. sure. it&#8217;s cool. Apple is cool. just be sure you have AppleCare on Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maccast 2011.12.23 &#8211; Blu-ray and Mac Home Theater by Jeff Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.maccast.com/2011/12/23/maccast-2011-12-23-blu-ray-and-mac-home-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-101907</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 19:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maccast.com/2011/12/23/maccast-2011-12-23-blu-ray-and-mac-home-theater/#comment-101907</guid>
		<description>Adam,

The Model Number is: CP40NG10.  Though LG&#039;s site says all their Blu-Ray internal/external devices are Mac compatible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>The Model Number is: CP40NG10.  Though LG&#8217;s site says all their Blu-Ray internal/external devices are Mac compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

