Written by: James Alguire
Categories: Hints & Tips
Excited about Leopard’s super cool groovy new features, but your Mac doesn’t meet the stiff new system requirements? According to Apple, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard cannot be directly installed on Macs with a G4 processor slower than 867 MHz. However, provided that you have access to a Leopard compatible Mac, there is a workaround. I discovered while trying to get Leopard working on my 800 MHz Titanium Powerbook, that while it can’t be installed directly, it will run from a drive with Leopard already installed.
So here is what needs to be done. First, get a Leopard compatible Mac. Take the older Mac start it up in target disk mode and connect it to the LCM (Leopard Compatible Mac) via a Firewire cable. Insert the Leopard installation disk in the LCM and start the installation process. When the installer asks where Leopard is to be installed, specify the Target Disk Mode connected Mac’s hard drive. Complete the installation process and once the LCM has happily booted from the new system shut it down, disconnect the older Mac, and power it down. Start the older Mac up and it should now be running Leopard.
Some caveats before doing this your own.
First: Running Leopard on Macs that do not meet the stated system requirements is not supported by Apple and they will not provide Leopard technical support for this configuration. Do this at your own risk.
Second: Do not use this technique from an INTEL-based Mac, only use qualified G4 or G5 processor Macs. The partitioning scheme for INTEL Macs is different and INTEL Macs can’t boot from drives formatted to boot PowerPC Macs and vice versa.
Third: Older Macs may not have enough processor horsepower, bus speed, or video RAM to effectively run Leopard (Forget about G3 Macs, there’s a reason they are excluded from the system requirements. Trying to boot a G3 Mac from a Leopard drive results in a kernel panic, I’ve tried). Leopard works just fine on my 800 MHz Powerbook, but older 400 MHz systems with a sub-200 MHz bus, and less than 32 MB of VRAM may have problems (unsure of your Mac’s specs, download Mactracker, a database tracking all Macs models ever made, www.mactracker.ca).
Fourth: Before you attempt this tip, be sure to back up all your critical data (maybe even clone the boot drive). Never perform major upgrades of any kind without backing up.
Trying to give an older Mac new Leopard super coolness, could work out great, or it could be time for a new Mac.
I have a powerbook G4 1.67GHz, so it’s completely compatible with Mac Os X 10.5, so it is not really in the subject of this post. But with the new update made some nice things for older laptops, first the frontrow now runs in every mac, even if it does not have the IR sensor (now we just need an update for the frontrow romeo plugin, to use a bluetooth fone to control your mac), second in my powerbook if I want the secondary click I can do it putting two fingers in the trackpad as it happens in the MacBooks, if you remember only the scroll was activated this way for PowerBooks…
Great info, too bad I just sold my G4 400mhz, ha now if that could run Leopard WTF!
We have an iMac G5 (well qualified for Leopard).
I have read, and witnessed first hand at the Apple Store, that the (Intel based) Macs run faster than before. For example, applications load noticeably quicker.
Here’s a question for the community: Should I except a similar boost of speed on a PowerPC based iMac? (2 GHz CPU, with 2 GB RAM)
Upgraded my iMac G4 1GHz 768MB on 27th October. (did a clean install) worked pretty well. It seems slightly faster and more responsive. Even features such as coverflow and quicklook in Finder, screen sharing is fairly usable. It slows down a bit with too many applications on the go but it did that before and is probably due to my low RAM. The only issue I have is that the internal, not easily upgradable 80GB is most taken up by a huge 48GB library folder in my home folder. I can’t track down why this is, I just use MS office iWorks and iLife. It means my photos and music have to sit on an external drive (not a huge problem, but very puzzling)
All in all amazing that this old machine can still use the new features of Leopard. I’ll not hold my breath to see if it’ll run 10.6, but who knows??
Hey!! would this work for installing 10.4 on a 900MHz G3 ??